Every claim cites its source No signup required Free — supported by disclosed affiliate links
Visit Innago →

Innago vs TenantCloud: which fits your rentals in 2026?

Pricing and features verified from vendor pricing pages on 2026-07-04.

Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you sign up through them we may earn a commission at no cost to you. It never affects rankings or verdicts, which are derived from published pricing and feature data. If a vendor's public offer is better than our link, we say so. How we make money.

The short version.

On pure cost, Innago wins: it has a genuinely usable free plan while TenantCloud starts at $15/mo. For a landlord with one or two units, that difference compounds to $180+ a year. Who each fits: Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees. Budget-conscious landlords with a handful of leases who want listings, screening, and rent collection for a low flat fee.

Visit Innago Visit TenantCloud

Pricing, side by side

InnagoTenantCloud
Starting priceFree tier$15/mo
Pricing modelflatflat, capped by lease count
Plans
Free — $0/mo
No monthly fee, no setup fee, no contract; unlimited units — revenue comes from tenant-side transaction and screening fees
Starter — $15/mo
$15/mo billed annually ($18 month-to-month); up to 10 leases, ACH $1.95/txn
Growth — $29.17/mo
$29.17/mo billed annually ($35 month-to-month); up to 30 leases, adds inspections and reporting, ACH $1.75/txn
Pro — $50/mo
$50/mo billed annually ($60 month-to-month); up to 60 leases, adds tax reports and bank reconciliation, ACH $1.50/txn
Business — custom
Starting around $100/mo; custom lease limits, team management and tools
Annual discount~17% off with annual billing (e.g. Starter $18 to $15/mo, Pro $60 to $50/mo)
Tenant screening$30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added$30 background check, $30 credit check, $40 full check — paid by applicant by default

Feature checklist

FeatureInnagoTenantCloud
Tenant screening
Online rent collection
Accounting & reporting
Maintenance tracking
Listing syndication
Leases & e-sign
Integrated banking
Landlord mobile app

Strengths and trade-offs

Innago

For
  • Entirely free for landlords — no monthly, setup, per-unit, or per-lease fees
  • Free lease templates and unlimited eSignatures included
  • Full tenant workflow: applications, screening, invoicing, maintenance in one place
  • Frequently praised responsive human support
Against
  • Tenants pay $2 per ACH payment and 2.99% for cards unless the landlord absorbs it
  • No integrated banking or high-yield cash accounts
  • Accounting is lighter than Stessa or Buildium; larger operators often pair it with QuickBooks

TenantCloud

For
  • Cheap entry point at $15-$18/mo with unlimited properties
  • Listings, screening, maintenance, and rent collection all in the base tier
  • Applicant-paid screening powered by TransUnion and Asurint
  • Clear upgrade path from solo landlord to team plan
Against
  • No free plan — the old free tier was discontinued
  • Lease-count caps (10 on Starter) force upgrades as you grow
  • Landlord pays ACH fees per transaction ($1.95 on Starter)
  • Tax reports and bank reconciliation locked behind the $50+/mo Pro tier
Try Innago Try TenantCloud

Frequently asked questions

Is Innago cheaper than TenantCloud?

Innago is free for landlords — it monetizes through tenant-side fees instead of subscriptions. TenantCloud starts at $15/mo (flat, capped by lease count); ~17% off with annual billing (e.g. Starter $18 to $15/mo, Pro $60 to $50/mo). Subscription price isn't the whole story — compare tenant-side ACH and screening fees too. Screening: Innago $30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added; TenantCloud $30 background check, $30 credit check, $40 full check — paid by applicant by default.

What does Innago have that TenantCloud doesn't?

At the feature-checklist level they match; the differences are in depth, fees, and support quality — see the full comparison above.

Which is better for a small landlord with 1–5 units?

Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees. Budget-conscious landlords with a handful of leases who want listings, screening, and rent collection for a low flat fee. If you're still unsure, start with whichever has the free tier — you can export your data and switch later.

Keep comparing