TurboTenant vs Innago: which fits your rentals in 2026?
Pricing and features verified from vendor pricing pages on 2026-07-04.
Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you sign up through them we may earn a commission at no cost to you. It never affects rankings or verdicts, which are derived from published pricing and feature data. How we make money.
Both have free plans, so the decision comes down to where each one hides its costs — check the per-transaction and tenant-side fees in the tables above, because those are what you (or your tenants) will actually pay. Who each fits: Cost-conscious DIY landlords with 1-10 doors who want free core tools and don't mind tenants absorbing the fees. Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees.
Pricing, side by side
| TurboTenant | Innago | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free tier | Free tier |
| Pricing model | flat (unlimited rentals) | flat |
| Plans | Free — $0/mo Unlimited rentals; marketing, applications, screening, rent collection, maintenance tracking; tenants pay $55 screening and $2 ACH fee; lease agreements sold a la carte Essentials — $12.42/mo $149/yr billed annually; adds lease agreements/e-sign and other perks; tenants still pay $2 ACH fee Pro — $16.58/mo $199/yr billed annually; tenant ACH fee waived, screening drops to $45, faster rent payouts (2-4 days vs 5-7) | Free — $0/mo No monthly fee, no setup fee, no contract; unlimited units — revenue comes from tenant-side transaction and screening fees |
| Annual discount | Displayed prices are annual billing ($149/yr Essentials, $199/yr Pro) | — |
| Tenant screening | $55 paid by applicant on the Free plan; $45 on the Pro plan | $30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added |
Feature checklist
| Feature | TurboTenant | Innago |
|---|---|---|
| Tenant screening | ✓ | ✓ |
| Online rent collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Accounting & reporting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Maintenance tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Listing syndication | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leases & e-sign | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated banking | — | — |
| Landlord mobile app | ✓ | ✓ |
Strengths and trade-offs
TurboTenant
For- Genuinely usable free plan with unlimited rentals — capped max cost of $199/yr
- Applicant-paid screening means $0 landlord cost to vet tenants
- One-click listing syndication and lead management included free
- Large ecosystem — 1M+ landlords, lots of educational content and templates
- Monetized via renter fees: $55 screening and $2-per-ACH-payment fee on the free plan land on your tenants
- Full accounting requires a separate paid REI Hub subscription
- State lease agreements cost extra unless you're on a paid plan
- Rent payouts take 5-7 business days unless you pay for Pro
Innago
For- Entirely free for landlords — no monthly, setup, per-unit, or per-lease fees
- Free lease templates and unlimited eSignatures included
- Full tenant workflow: applications, screening, invoicing, maintenance in one place
- Frequently praised responsive human support
- Tenants pay $2 per ACH payment and 2.99% for cards unless the landlord absorbs it
- No integrated banking or high-yield cash accounts
- Accounting is lighter than Stessa or Buildium; larger operators often pair it with QuickBooks
Frequently asked questions
Is TurboTenant cheaper than Innago?
TurboTenant has a free plan; paid tiers start at $12.42/mo (flat (unlimited rentals)). Innago is free for landlords — it monetizes through tenant-side fees instead of subscriptions. Subscription price isn't the whole story — compare tenant-side ACH and screening fees too. Screening: TurboTenant $55 paid by applicant on the Free plan; $45 on the Pro plan; Innago $30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added.
What does TurboTenant have that Innago doesn't?
At the feature-checklist level they match; the differences are in depth, fees, and support quality — see the full comparison above.
Which is better for a small landlord with 1–5 units?
Cost-conscious DIY landlords with 1-10 doors who want free core tools and don't mind tenants absorbing the fees. Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees. If you're still unsure, start with whichever has the free tier — you can export your data and switch later.