Every claim cites its source No signup required Free — supported by disclosed affiliate links

Avail vs Innago: which fits your rentals in 2026?

Pricing and features verified from vendor pricing pages on 2026-07-04.

Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you sign up through them we may earn a commission at no cost to you. It never affects rankings or verdicts, which are derived from published pricing and feature data. If a vendor's public offer is better than our link, we say so. How we make money.

The short version.

Both have free plans, so the decision comes down to where each one hides its costs — check the per-transaction and tenant-side fees in the tables above, because those are what you (or your tenants) will actually pay. Who each fits: First-time or small landlords (1-5 units) who want a polished free end-to-end tool and may selectively upgrade single units to Plus. Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees.

Visit Avail Visit Innago

Pricing, side by side

AvailInnago
Starting priceFree tierFree tier
Pricing modelper unitflat
Plans
Unlimited — $0/mo
Free, unlimited units: listings on 19 sites, applications/screening, state-specific leases with e-sign, rent collection (tenant pays $2.50/ACH), maintenance tracking, income/expense tracking
Unlimited Plus — $9/mo
$9/unit/month; waived tenant ACH fees, next-day FastPay payouts, custom applications and lease clauses, lease cloning, property marketing website, 2x faster support
Free — $0/mo
No monthly fee, no setup fee, no contract; unlimited units — revenue comes from tenant-side transaction and screening fees
Annual discount
Tenant screeningVaries by state law; paid by the applicant most commonly, though the landlord can choose to cover it$30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added

Feature checklist

FeatureAvailInnago
Tenant screening
Online rent collection
Accounting & reporting
Maintenance tracking
Listing syndication
Leases & e-sign
Integrated banking
Landlord mobile app

Strengths and trade-offs

Avail

For
  • Free tier covers the entire rental cycle for unlimited units, including state-specific lawyer-reviewed leases
  • Backed by Realtor.com — listings syndicate to 19 sites including the Realtor.com network
  • Simple, transparent upgrade: one $9/unit/mo Plus tier, no contracts
  • Screening costs are applicant-paid by default
Against
  • Free plan pushes a $2.50 ACH fee per rent payment onto tenants (3.5% for cards on any plan)
  • Next-day payouts, custom leases, and waived ACH fees are all locked behind Plus
  • $9/unit/mo scales badly past a handful of units versus flat-fee competitors
  • Accounting is basic income/expense tracking, not real bookkeeping

Innago

For
  • Entirely free for landlords — no monthly, setup, per-unit, or per-lease fees
  • Free lease templates and unlimited eSignatures included
  • Full tenant workflow: applications, screening, invoicing, maintenance in one place
  • Frequently praised responsive human support
Against
  • Tenants pay $2 per ACH payment and 2.99% for cards unless the landlord absorbs it
  • No integrated banking or high-yield cash accounts
  • Accounting is lighter than Stessa or Buildium; larger operators often pair it with QuickBooks
Try Avail Try Innago

Frequently asked questions

Is Avail cheaper than Innago?

Avail has a free plan; paid tiers start at $9/mo (per unit). Innago is free for landlords — it monetizes through tenant-side fees instead of subscriptions. Subscription price isn't the whole story — compare tenant-side ACH and screening fees too. Screening: Avail Varies by state law; paid by the applicant most commonly, though the landlord can choose to cover it; Innago $30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added.

What does Avail have that Innago doesn't?

At the feature-checklist level they match; the differences are in depth, fees, and support quality — see the full comparison above.

Which is better for a small landlord with 1–5 units?

First-time or small landlords (1-5 units) who want a polished free end-to-end tool and may selectively upgrade single units to Plus. Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees. If you're still unsure, start with whichever has the free tier — you can export your data and switch later.

Keep comparing