Every claim cites its source No signup required Free — supported by disclosed affiliate links
Visit Innago →

Innago vs Rentec Direct: which fits your rentals in 2026?

Pricing and features verified from vendor pricing pages on 2026-07-04.

Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you sign up through them we may earn a commission at no cost to you. It never affects rankings or verdicts, which are derived from published pricing and feature data. If a vendor's public offer is better than our link, we say so. How we make money.

The short version.

On pure cost, Innago wins: it has a genuinely usable free plan while Rentec Direct starts at $55/mo. For a landlord with one or two units, that difference compounds to $660+ a year. Who each fits: Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees. Landlords and small property-management companies who value live US-based support and cheap screening over a modern interface.

Visit Innago Visit Rentec Direct

Pricing, side by side

InnagoRentec Direct
Starting priceFree tier$55/mo
Pricing modelflatper unit
Plans
Free — $0/mo
No monthly fee, no setup fee, no contract; unlimited units — revenue comes from tenant-side transaction and screening fees
Rentec Pro — $55/mo
$55/mo base for landlords/investors; price scales with unit count up to 2,500+ (contact for more)
Rentec PM — $65/mo
$65/mo base for property managers; adds trust account management/reporting and owner portal
Annual discountSave 10% with annual subscription
Tenant screening$30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added$10 basic, $13 enhanced, $18 premium per report at discounted landlord rates; cost can be passed to applicant

Feature checklist

FeatureInnagoRentec Direct
Tenant screening
Online rent collection
Accounting & reporting
Maintenance tracking
Listing syndication
Leases & e-sign
Integrated banking
Landlord mobile app

Strengths and trade-offs

Innago

For
  • Entirely free for landlords — no monthly, setup, per-unit, or per-lease fees
  • Free lease templates and unlimited eSignatures included
  • Full tenant workflow: applications, screening, invoicing, maintenance in one place
  • Frequently praised responsive human support
Against
  • Tenants pay $2 per ACH payment and 2.99% for cards unless the landlord absorbs it
  • No integrated banking or high-yield cash accounts
  • Accounting is lighter than Stessa or Buildium; larger operators often pair it with QuickBooks

Rentec Direct

For
  • Free unlimited US-based phone support, training, and personalized setup
  • Free online rent payments — no ACH fees advertised for landlords
  • Cheapest screening in this group ($10-$18 per report)
  • Trust accounting and owner portal on the PM tier; unlimited properties and users
Against
  • Interface feels dated next to newer rivals like Azibo or Stessa
  • Pricing scales per unit, so costs grow steadily with portfolio size
  • No integrated banking product
  • Only a two-week free trial, no free tier
Try Innago Try Rentec Direct

Frequently asked questions

Is Innago cheaper than Rentec Direct?

Innago is free for landlords — it monetizes through tenant-side fees instead of subscriptions. Rentec Direct starts at $55/mo (per unit); save 10% with annual subscription. Subscription price isn't the whole story — compare tenant-side ACH and screening fees too. Screening: Innago $30 paid by applicant for credit + criminal reports, $35 with eviction history added; Rentec Direct $10 basic, $13 enhanced, $18 premium per report at discounted landlord rates; cost can be passed to applicant.

What does Innago have that Rentec Direct doesn't?

At the feature-checklist level they match; the differences are in depth, fees, and support quality — see the full comparison above.

Which is better for a small landlord with 1–5 units?

Small-to-mid-size landlords who want a genuinely free, full tenant-management workflow and don't mind tenant-side payment fees. Landlords and small property-management companies who value live US-based support and cheap screening over a modern interface. If you're still unsure, start with whichever has the free tier — you can export your data and switch later.

Keep comparing